SourceMap Supplier shortlist Supplier Shortlist · USD 119
Injection moulded enclosures, 40k units, EU delivery
Eleven candidate suppliers found and structured from public evidence, with the questions that separate them.
You need an enclosure moulder for 40,000 units a year, delivered into the EU, with a tool you intend to own. This shortlist is the research half of that job: eleven candidates that plausibly fit, what is publicly verifiable about each, and the seven questions that will separate them once you make contact. It does not rank them on price, because none of them publish one.
Four suppliers match on capability, geography and visible certification and have public evidence of work at your volume. Three more are plausible but unverifiable from public sources. The remaining four are listed so you know why they were excluded rather than missed.
Requirement
What was searched for
Every candidate below was assessed against this, and nothing else. If any line is wrong, the shortlist is wrong, and it is worth correcting before you spend a week on outreach.
| Requirement | As you specified | How it was used in the search |
|---|---|---|
| Process | Injection moulding, ABS and PC-ABS | Hard filter. Non-moulders excluded |
| Annual volume | 40,000 units, two variants | Hard filter. Excluded prototype-only shops |
| Tooling | You own the tool, moved if needed | Critical question, rarely public |
| Delivery | Into Netherlands, DDP preferred | Filter on EU presence or established EU freight |
| Certification | ISO 9001 minimum, 13485 desirable | Verified where a certificate or registry entry is public |
| Lead time | Under 6 weeks steady state | Never publicly stated |
| Secondary operations | Pad printing and insert fitting | Soft filter. Noted where public |
Two requirements, tooling ownership and lead time, are almost never published by anyone in this industry. They are the first two questions in section 04 for exactly that reason.
Shortlist
The eleven, and what is verifiable
| Process | Volume | EU delivery | ISO 9001 | Secondary ops | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supplier 01, PL | Verified | Verified | Verified | Certificate public | Both |
| Supplier 02, PT | Verified | Verified | Verified | Certificate public | Printing only |
| Supplier 03, CZ | Verified | Verified | Verified | Registry entry | Both |
| Supplier 04, TR | Verified | Verified | Stated | Certificate public | Both |
| Supplier 05, DE | Verified | Unclear | Verified | Certificate public | Unknown |
| Supplier 06, PL | Verified | Unclear | Verified | Claimed only | Unknown |
| Supplier 07, CN | Verified | Verified | Via freight only | Claimed only | Both |
| Supplier 08, IT | Verified | Too small | Verified | Certificate public | Printing only |
| Supplier 09, UK | Verified | Verified | Customs step | Certificate public | Both |
| Supplier 10, ES | Prototype only | Too small | Verified | None found | Unknown |
| Supplier 11, RO | Verified | Unclear | Verified | None found | Unknown |
Verified means a public document, registry entry or dated case study supports the claim. Stated means the supplier says so on its own site with nothing behind it. Named companies, addresses and contacts are in the workspace copy.
01, 02, 03 and 04
All verified on process, volume and certification, all with public evidence of work at or above 40,000 units. Contact all four, not one. Four quotes is the minimum that tells you what the market price actually is.
05, 06, 09 and 11
Plausible but with a real gap: unclear volume, a claimed rather than evidenced certification, or a customs step you would have to price. Worth contacting only if the first four disappoint.
07, 08 and 10
07 has no EU presence and your DDP requirement makes that expensive. 08 and 10 are below your volume by a wide margin. Listed so you can disagree with the exclusion, not so you can act on it.
Risk
Dependencies worth noticing now
| Risk | Which candidates | Why it matters at 40k units | Severity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool ownership and transfer terms | All eleven | If the tool cannot leave, your second quote next year is not a real quote | Critical |
| Single site, no second press | 04, 06, 11 | One press failure becomes your stockout | High |
| Resin sourced through the moulder | All eleven | Price moves with resin. Who carries that is a contract question | High |
| Customs and DDP responsibility | 07, 09 | A DDP price that quietly excludes duty is not a DDP price | Medium |
| Certification claimed, not evidenced | 06, 07, 11 | Ask for the certificate number and check the registry yourself | Medium |
| Minimum order per run | Unknown for all | 40k a year in four runs is a different business to one run | Medium |
The first row is the one that decides your next three years. A moulder who will not put tool transfer in writing is not a supplier, they are a landlord.
Outreach
The seven questions, and the order to ask them
Send the same seven to all four in the same week. Identical questions are what makes the answers comparable, and the speed and quality of the reply is itself the first piece of data about working with them.
- We own the tool. Confirm in writing that we may remove it on 30 days notice with no charge beyond outstanding invoices.
- What is your steady-state lead time for 10,000 units of a two-cavity ABS part, from purchase order to DDP Rotterdam?
- What is the minimum quantity per run, and what does the price look like at 5,000, 10,000 and 20,000 per run?
- Who buys the resin, and how is a resin price movement handled between quote and delivery?
- Give your ISO 9001 certificate number and issuing body so we can check the registry.
- Is this part run on one press or can it be moved to a second, and where is that press?
- Send one reference for a part of similar size and volume, with the year it ran.
- Week 1
Send the seven to all four
Same email, same day. Note who replies inside 48 hours and who needs chasing.
- Week 2
Verify the certificates yourself
Every certificate number goes into the issuing body's public registry. This takes ten minutes and it is the only claim in this whole process you can check without trusting anyone.
- Week 3
Request quotes, not indications
With a drawing, a tolerance, a finish and a volume schedule. An indication given without those is a number that will change.
- Week 4
Get the tool transfer clause agreed before the deposit
Not after the first run. Once the tool is in their press and running, your negotiating position on this specific point is gone.