What the customer receives

CommunityOS example report

The paid deliverable is a structured document the customer keeps, not a chat transcript.

A complete sample document, written the way CommunityOS writes one. The customer, the numbers and the sources are illustrative.

CommunityOS Community operations setup

Community Ops Setup · USD 99

Rules, an escalation map, and the eleven questions asked every week

The operating layer for a 14,000 member community currently held together by two volunteers and a founder who does not sleep.

Prepared for
Lumen Protocol · 14,200 members across two platforms
Reference
CO-5519-COS
Issued
11 October 2026
Settlement
$CMTY · USDC on Base

The community works and it is not run. Rules exist in a pinned message from 2024, moderation depends on whoever is awake, and the same eleven questions are answered from scratch every week. This is the operating layer: written rules, a three tier escalation map, a knowledge base seeded with those eleven answers, and a weekly cadence.

One rule is being enforced inconsistently

Everything here is straightforward except the promotion rule, which two moderators interpret differently and which accounts for six of the eight member disputes in the last quarter. It needs a decision from you, not a process from us.

14,200 Members, two platforms
11 Questions asked every week
3 Moderators, all volunteers
1 Rule needing your decision
01

Decision needed

The promotion rule

The pinned rules say no unsolicited promotion. In practice three different standards are being applied depending on who is online, and members have noticed.

SituationModerator AModerator BYou
Member links their own project in a reply Allowed Removed Allowed
Member posts their project as a new thread Removed Removed Allowed if relevant
Member shares a job at their company Allowed Allowed Allowed
Member shares an airdrop or token launch Removed Removed Removed
Long-standing member shares a paid course Allowed Removed Unclear

Rows one, two and five are being decided differently by different people on different days. Six of eight disputes last quarter came from exactly these three cases, and every one of them was a member who had seen somebody else do the same thing without consequence.

Option A

Self-promotion allowed in one channel only

Simple, enforceable by anyone, and the standard most communities of this size land on. Costs you some goodwill from members who currently promote freely in replies.

Option B

Allowed in replies, never as a new thread

Closest to what actually happens now. Harder to explain and still requires a judgement call on row five.

Option C

Contribution threshold

Members past a participation bar may promote. Fairest in principle and the hardest to enforce without an argument about where the bar is.

02

Escalation

Who handles what

Three tiers, with response expectations
Handled byResponseEscalates to
Question already in the knowledge base Any moderatorLink, under 1 hourNothing
New question, factual Any moderatorSame dayAdded to knowledge base
Question about roadmap or token Core team onlyNext weekdayYou
Rule breach, first time Any moderatorRemove and explain, privatelyLogged
Rule breach, repeat Lead moderatorTimeout, loggedYou, weekly
Harassment or safety Lead moderatorImmediate removalYou, immediately
Scam, impersonation or phishing Any moderatorImmediate ban, no warningYou, immediately
Legal threat or regulator contact Nobody. StopNo response at allYou and your lawyer

The last row matters more than it looks. Moderators are volunteers and should never respond to a legal threat, a regulator, or anything that reads like either. The instruction is to forward it and say nothing, and it should be the first thing every moderator is told.

03

Knowledge

The eleven questions

Counted across ninety days of messages. Each one is answered from scratch by whoever is online, which is roughly four hours a week of re-answering and the main reason your moderators are tired.

Times asked in 90 days
How do I get the contributor role 84
When is the next community call 71 A pinned calendar removes this entirely
Is this wallet address official 66 Safety relevant
Where is the documentation 58
How do I report a bug 44
Are you hiring 39
Can I translate the docs 31
What happened to feature X 28 Needs a roadmap answer from you
Is there a mobile version 24
How do I leave feedback 19
Who do I contact about partnerships 17

The third question is the important one. Sixty six people in ninety days asked whether an address was official, which means impersonation attempts are routine in your community and members are doing the right thing by asking. A pinned, canonical answer is a safety measure, not a convenience.

04

Cadence

The community week

  1. Monday

    Weekly thread, same format every time

    What shipped, what is next, one question to the community. Predictability is what makes a community ritual work and this one has been irregular since March.

  2. Wednesday

    Moderator sync, fifteen minutes

    Anything ambiguous from the week, any rule that felt wrong. This is where the promotion rule would have surfaced six months ago.

  3. Thursday

    One prompt or poll

    Low effort, keeps the space active between announcements.

  4. Friday

    New questions into the knowledge base

    Anything answered twice this week becomes an entry. The list in section 03 stops growing.

  5. Monthly

    Community call, fixed date

    Second Tuesday. Seventy one people asked when it was, which means they want it and cannot find it.

  • Promotion rule decided and written in one sentence
  • Escalation map shared with all three moderators
  • Legal and regulator instruction given explicitly
  • Canonical wallet address pinned and linked from the docs
  • Eleven answers seeded into the knowledge base
  • Community call date fixed and pinned
CommunityOS operations setup · confidential to the buyer · 11 October 2026 CommunityOS · $CMTY
The order behind this document
Format

Structured document with tables, checklists and cited evidence.

Back to CommunityOS →