What the customer receives

Olivia Martin example advisory memo

This Organization does not sell a long report. It sells one person's judgment on one question, and here the answer is to renegotiate rather than to walk away.

A complete sample document, written the way Olivia Martin writes one. The customer, the numbers and the sources are illustrative.

Olivia Martin Advisory memo

Decision Call · USD 180

The partnership is working. The revenue share is what is wrong.

60 minute call, 11 November. Reviewed and signed off by Olivia Martin on 13 November.

Prepared for
Kwame Boateng · founder, Sablefield, 16 staff
Reference
OM-M-41113
Issued
13 November 2026
Settlement
$BDADV · USDC on Base

You asked whether to end the Halvorsen partnership. It produces 28 percent of your new customers and loses you money on every one, which sounds like a reason to end it and is actually a reason to fix the terms you agreed in 2024 when you had no leverage.

Renegotiate. Do not end it, and do not let it run as it is.

At a 40 percent revenue share for the customer's lifetime, Halvorsen customers contribute 11 percent less than a direct customer over three years despite costing you nothing to acquire. The structure is wrong, not the partnership: a lifetime share on a subscription product is a permanent tax on a one-off service. A 40 percent first-year share with nothing afterwards would be worth more to you and, on their own economics, is likely acceptable to them.

28% Of new customers via Halvorsen
40% Revenue share, for life
-11% Three year contribution vs direct
2024 When the terms were set
1

The question

What was asked, and what was reviewed

As you put it: "They bring us a third of our customers and I think we are losing money on them. Do we get out?"

ReviewedSource
The partnership agreement, 2024 Supplied
Revenue by acquisition source, 30 months Supplied
Retention by source Supplied. Clause 2
Support cost by source Supplied
Your direct acquisition cost Supplied
Halvorsen's public positioning and pricing Public
What Halvorsen gets out of it Inferred. See clause 4
2

The numbers

A Halvorsen customer against a direct one

Halvorsen customerDirect customer
Acquisition cost to you ZeroUSD 310
Revenue share paid 40 percent, foreverNone
Average tenure 41 months29 months
Support cost per year LowerHigher
Year one contribution HigherLower, after acquisition cost
Year two contribution About equalAbout equal
Year three onward Much lowerMuch higher
Three year total 11 percent lowerBaseline

The tenure figure is the interesting one. Halvorsen customers stay 12 months longer than direct ones, which normally makes a channel more valuable and here makes it less, because every extra month is a month of paying 40 percent.

3

Options

Three routes

What you asked about

End it

Loses 28 percent of new customers with nothing replacing them, and your direct channel is not currently capable of absorbing that. It also ends well only if you handle the existing shared customers carefully. This is the worst of the three.

Recommended

Renegotiate to a first-year share

40 percent of year one, nothing after. On your numbers that makes a Halvorsen customer worth 23 percent more than a direct one over three years, and it is a structure partners in their position usually prefer, because it front-loads their cash.

Defensible

Leave it and grow direct

Treat Halvorsen as a fixed cost of a channel that works and spend the effort on direct acquisition instead. Reasonable if you think renegotiating risks the relationship, and it leaves a permanent 11 percent on the table.

4

Uncertain

What I do not know

UnresolvedWhy it matters
What Halvorsen's economics actually are My read on why they would accept is inference from their pricing and size, not knowledge
Whether the agreement can be varied I read the commercial terms, not the amendment or termination clauses. Your solicitor should
Whether the relationship can take the conversation You know this and I do not
Whether existing customers would transfer to new terms Usually they stay on the old ones. That changes the value of the deal and needs to be part of the ask
5

Next

What to do

  1. Have your solicitor read the amendment and termination clauses before you raise anything. Ten minutes of reading changes how you open the conversation.
  2. Decide what you want for the existing cohort. Asking to move 30 months of customers onto new terms is a much bigger ask than new customers only, and conflating them is how this stalls.
  3. Open it as a structure conversation, not a rate conversation. You are not asking them to take less; you are proposing they take more, sooner.
  4. Have the year one number ready at 45 percent and the walk-away at 40 for new customers only.
  5. Whatever is agreed, put a review date in it. The 2024 terms had none, which is why you are here.
OM-M-41113 · reviewed by Olivia Martin, 13 November 2026 · $BDADV · 13 November 2026 Olivia Martin · $BDADV
The order behind this document
Format

A short memo from a scoped call: the question, what the numbers show, the three routes and the one to take.

Back to Olivia Martin →